<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Everything You Know About English Is Wrong &#187; slang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://everythingyouknowaboutenglishiswrong.com/blog1/index.php/category/slang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://everythingyouknowaboutenglishiswrong.com/blog1</link>
	<description>Cantankerous commentary on what we speak and why we speak it, from Bill Brohaugh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:01:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Annoyed? Absolutely!</title>
		<link>http://everythingyouknowaboutenglishiswrong.com/blog1/2008/11/11/annoyed-absolutely/</link>
		<comments>http://everythingyouknowaboutenglishiswrong.com/blog1/2008/11/11/annoyed-absolutely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Brohaugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[language misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cliches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damp Squid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Butterfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everythingyouknowaboutenglishiswrong.com/blog1/2008/11/11/annoyed-absolutely/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new book from Oxford University Press, A Damp Squid: The English Language Laid Bare, has researched an important topic, resulting in a list of the top ten annoying phrases (you may be surprised that &#8220;Mr. Brohaugh has an opinion&#8221; is not among them). 
They are:

At the end of the day
Fairly unique
I personally
At this moment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new book from Oxford University Press, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0199239061?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=thegrillofvic-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0199239061">A Damp Squid: The English Language Laid Bare</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=thegrillofvic-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0199239061" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />, has researched an important topic, resulting in a list of the top ten annoying phrases (you may be surprised that &#8220;Mr. Brohaugh has an opinion&#8221; is not among them). </p>
<p>They are:
<ol>
<li>At the end of the day
<li>Fairly unique
<li>I personally
<li>At this moment in time
<li>With all due respect
<li>Absolutely
<li>It&#8217;s a nightmare
<li>Shouldn&#8217;t of
<li>24/7
<li>It&#8217;s not rocket science</ol>
<p>Some classics there, particularly #4 and #10. I puzzle over &#8220;shouldn&#8217;t of,&#8221; though. Is this in written English or spoken English? As with such phrasings as &#8220;I should of looked up the answer to that question,&#8221; the <i>of</i> is a phonetic spelling of a contraction. &#8220;I should of&#8221; represents &#8220;I should&#8217;ve.&#8221; The phrase &#8220;shouldn&#8217;t of&#8221; perhaps attracts particular attraction because it is an unusual instance of a double contraction: <i>shouldn&#8217;t've</i>. Multiple contractions are hardly unknown&mdash;consider the pronunciation of a word I&#8217;m sure you use on a daily basis: <i>forecastle</i> pronounced as  <i>fo&#8217;c&#8217;sl</i>.</p>
<p>OK, maybe you don&#8217;t use it on a daily basis or even daily, which I mention because <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/3400722/Literally-tops-a-list-of-the-most-hated-phrases-of-Daily-Telegraph-readers.html" target="_blank">The Daily Telegraph followed Oxford&#8217;s list with a reader-generated list:</a>
<ol>
<li>Literally
<li>A safe pair of hands
<li>I&#8217;m gutted
<li>Basically
<li>Going forward
<li>Upcoming
<li>Up until
<li>Neither here not there
<li>On a daily basis</ol>
<p>I&#8217;m curious about what &#8220;a safe pair of hands&#8221; means. Is it British? Or am I just cloistered? I&#8217;ve never heard it before so haven&#8217;t yet had a chance to be annoyed.</p>
<p>As for me, I&#8217;m actually going to nominate <i>actually</i> as my greatest source of annoyance at (you knew I was going to annoy you and say it) this moment in time.</p>
<p>(Might I also note that to my moderately math-trained eye, 24/7 seems to equate to 3.428571429.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://everythingyouknowaboutenglishiswrong.com/blog1/2008/11/11/annoyed-absolutely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mockery within my grrr-rasp</title>
		<link>http://everythingyouknowaboutenglishiswrong.com/blog1/2008/10/29/mockery-within-my-grrr-rasp/</link>
		<comments>http://everythingyouknowaboutenglishiswrong.com/blog1/2008/10/29/mockery-within-my-grrr-rasp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Brohaugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English origins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misspelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[razz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everythingyouknowaboutenglishiswrong.com/blog1/2008/10/29/mockery-within-my-grrr-rasp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How poetically satisfying to razz the misspelling of raspberry.
I spotted this concession item list on my recent BBQ travels (note the tea flavor at the top):

I&#8217;m not going to simply make fun of the misspelling. I&#8217;m going to razz it. Because razz is ultimately a shortening of raspberry, as in &#8220;giving misspellers the raspberry,&#8221; which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How poetically satisfying to razz the misspelling of <i>raspberry</i>.</p>
<p>I spotted this concession item list on my recent BBQ travels (note the tea flavor at the top):</p>
<p><center><img src="http://everythingyouknowaboutenglishiswrong.com/images/Rasberry.jpg" width="219" height="322" border="0" alt="razzleberry dressing"></center></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to simply make fun of the misspelling. I&#8217;m going to <i>razz</i> it. Because <i>razz</i> is ultimately a shortening of <i>raspberry</i>, as in &#8220;giving misspellers the raspberry,&#8221; which is in turn a shortening of &#8220;raspberry tart,&#8221; rhyming slang for <i>fart</i>. A raspberry tart is a description of the mocking fart sound you create by sticking your tongue out between otherwise closed lips and blowing.</p>
<p>So, raspberries to <i>rasberry tea</i>&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;. though as we consider the bodily sources of words, I wonder. Is a side benefit of drinking lots of rasberry tea avoiding the need to P?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://everythingyouknowaboutenglishiswrong.com/blog1/2008/10/29/mockery-within-my-grrr-rasp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.277 seconds -->

